Friday, August 16, 2013

A Day of Southern Comfort


My first day on Georgia Tech’s campus was filled with to-do’s, and I was anxious to get them done. It was going to require extensive wayfinding and muddling through a lot of vagueness, and my experience with administrative processes pushed me to be as prepared as possible. A stereotype of sorts existed in my head: these people were going to be cranky. They were going to want the exchange to go as smoothly as possible, and if it didn't, I’d be starting school without a head.

Two instances on this first day took my perceived social norms and stereotypes and obliterated them:

The first came during my “New Hire” paperwork submission process. They encouraged GTA/GRA students to fill out and print the forms ahead of time but would have two labs available for day-of processing. Because of a lack of printer, I had arrived with a thumb drive of compiled forms. A quick-print later, I was queued up to the first station. The woman working with me began flipping through the forms, “Do you have your G-4?”

“Uhhh…” I’m mentally checking them off… W-4, I-9… G-4? The heck? “I don’t think I do.”

Great – I look incompetent.

“I’ll go back to the lab – I can fill it out and come back –” and instead of nodding in agreement, the lady shakes her head no. “Why don’t we see if we have a blank copy and we’ll just fill it out here.”

She then spends four minutes searching for one. Each time she passes, I tell her if it’s easier, I can just come back. Each time she responds ‘it’s not a problem’ and ‘don’t worry about it’.

I’m baffled. Why is she being so nice? I’m the unprepared one.

After another minute of bustling around, she returned, slightly breathless, and said “there we are,” before handing me the document, and patiently waiting until I finished.

The entire experience struck me as strange: this lady had been there all day, working with students and filing forms, yet her demeanor was the exact opposite of what I’d stereotyped. At 2 pm, I imagined frustrated, crabby workers issuing disgruntled rejections to students approaching with missing documents. Instead, she approached the entire experience as though it was my time being wasted – not hers.

***

The second instance came when I went to get my parking pass. For this I felt better prepared: license, registration and student id number - perfect. After a 25 minute wait in line, I stepped up to the counter, and the lady asked for my information. I recited off my id# as written on my post-it and awaited her follow-up questions.

They didn't come.

Instead, she scowled slightly at the computer. “Can you say it again? I must have typed it in wrong…” So I again listed off the 9 digits, my confidence shrinking slightly. Again she scowled, “You sure that’s your number?”

Red-faced terror: “Uhhh…. Yea?”

I’ll digress for a second: One of my most irrational fears is that I’ll wake up one day going through steps to a life that I think is correct but are totally inaccurate. For instance, this would randomly occur in high school when I’d walk into, say, my Calculus class and be struck with this sudden concern that I was in some alternate universe, and I was supposed to be in French or detention. This same fear exists on the first day of classes when professors read off attendance, and I find myself with shaky hands, dry mouth and a lack of oxygen flowing to my brain as he/she gets closer to the middle of the alphabet until my name is finally called.

Anyways, this ridiculously irrational fear struck like lightning as I stood at the counter: Was I on the wrong campus? Had I accidentally accepted admission to a different school by mistake? Was I supposed to be in Montana, or something? Was I even going to school for Architecture?!

It was unexplainable, and in .003 seconds, I’d concluded myself crazy. Sensing this, the lady at the counter asked me if I had copied my number down correctly. I paused, thinking back to my random dyslexia with rushed number copying… was that the cause? I clutched at this light as I pondered the possibility. The lady asked if I had my school id with me to which I responded “no, getting it is still on my to-do list.” She followed up asking if I could access my number.

“Uhhh…” – my floundering was ridiculous. She half-smiled, asking if my phone could access it.

Oh, right!! Technology! The world in my palm! My glimmer of hope grows – “Yea, yea I can do that.”

She asks me to pass her the remaining information while I look it up. I unlock my phone, click my internet browser and wait.

And wait.

And wait.

Nothing. I grow restless. If I’m growing restless, I imagine this lady is fuming with hidden frustration at my incompetence. I attempt to dissuade this by explaining to her that my phone is loading. Three decades later, my phone accepts its role as a piece of 21st Century technology and allows me to type in G-Tech’s student center website.

And I wait.

At this point I’m literally spewing apology after apology:

I ask if I should leave and get back in line after I access my number. She shakes her head no and encourages me to take my time.

I follow-up expressing my concern for causing a delay to the others in line. She says there are plenty of counters to accommodate everyone.

I’m utterly baffled at this entire exchange. I feel like I've been at this counter four times longer than I spent in line. I’m waiting for this friendly demeanor to come crashing down into annoyance or disdain at my snail’s pace, but it never comes.

She finished keying in my other information hours ago at this point, and she calmly inquires about where I’m trying to pull the number from. I explain my intended route, and she nods and begins working on the computer again.

“Got it,” she says less than ten seconds later.

“What? How?” She had requested my number from some higher power immediately after learning I didn't have it. I learned their systems are responsive only to id numbers and she had messaged into some other branch asking for it to be forwarded to her.

Three minutes later, I was finished, and she smiled and thanked me for stopping in.

This kind interaction has occurred an unnatural number of times since my arrival – all with the same frazzled mindset on my part and calm, patient approach from everyone else. It’s hard to shift into a culture like this when much of my experiences have revolved around not making the other guy mad. An effort to be proficient at not wasting others’ time for fear of angry-backlash is so ingrained in me, that anything less than competent on my part has a certain degree of failure to it.


My week-long experience here has begun teaching me a new way of socializing: it’s about making the most of the interaction you're experiencing in the moment– not three minutes from now. Having experience retail/customer service, there are moments when my frustration at someone holding up the cash-wrap line due to indecision has reached near boiling point - I'd think 'why can't this guy just choose already, or at least step out of line - he's hindering the line, and then I'll have to deal with angry people!'

Here, it’s not about processing everyone as quickly as possible or feeling pushy because you're concerned the next guy in line might upset at the additional 2 minute wait – it’s ensuring the experience of the person you’re with in that moment is fulfilling.

I think I like this shift.

Thursday, May 30, 2013

An Advocate for Breaks

***
 I’ve decided to start a blog. Your ability to see this webpage has made that a statement of the obvious. I don’t really know what will come of it – I may get lazy and have this be the last post I ever make. I’d like to think not, but nothing is for sure.

I’ve recently come into some free time and these posts are a direct result of what happens when I’m not in school. All this free time will probably turn into a gateway to hard drugs and a life on the streets. I hope not, but we’ll see…

If I’m correct in the assumption, blogs tend to be one person ranting or relaying a story/event and people comment on how exciting that is. My interest in starting this is less about my tirades and more about opening subjects up for discussion. I have no doubt this is exactly what people want to do with their free time.…

If you like it: neat. If not: that’s cool. I’m pondering out loud which means if you disagree – awesome. I don’t know what I’m saying half the time anyway. I’m literally writing because I want other perspectives on the topics discussed. Some topics are architecture-specific. If your personal focus isn’t on architecture, your opinion would still be awesome – an outside opinion/correlation to anything is completely warranted and would be intriguing to further discussion.

***

After spending a week-ish recuperating from my final undergraduate semester, my brain is refreshed, updated, and thinking for itself again. One of the joys of having a studio-based semester with various 3-credit courses consuming your every-waking second is that your brain falls into a sort of autopilot mode.

I’ve come to discover that this autopilot is two-sided in its existence. 

Firstly, it limits your brain's ability to wander aimlessly. This is fantastic for a couple of reasons - none more-so though than its ability to restrict unrelated thoughts/subjects less connected to projects. You’ve suddenly got this magical ability to not have the patience to focus on things unrelated to your work. It’s the ultimate working mode: you ignore everyone, you kick yourself for being hungry and you have no idea what Pandora is playing. It’s like you’re on a high dosage of Adderall or travelling with the tunneled vision of a Warp 3 ship.

On the other hand, your brain loses its ability to wander purposefully. Some of my best ideas come early in the semester. It's weird, because we inherently believe that spending 80-hour weeks reworking and formulating new iterations, we'd have more refined, resolved, and cohesive ideas. However, it’s all come to seem a little backwards.

I can’t speak for fellow studiomates, but for me the beginning of the semester is traditionally filled with periods of non-architecture related tangents including playing catch, sleep and food. We eat dinner at home, go out on Friday night and read the news for its content and not as a form of procrastination. We have some semblance of a social-life.

Typically by the second week, the transition is being made: we may still take a night off to play a board game, get a haircut, or go grocery shopping, but our brains are slowly transitioning into that autopilot way of working. A hierarchy is developing in our schedules, and more often than not, our socializing is a guilty procrastination. We’re cheating on our projects when we go out and feel guilty when studio rolls around and your designs haven’t changed in over 24-hours.

This continues developing until a week before mid-reviews. We suddenly implode, staring at the drafting table or computer frantic to uncover some deeper meaning in our designs that we hadn’t before seen, we cater to our professor’s likes and dislikes, and we hope for a few decent hours of sleep in the meantime. We become temporary yes-men for the sake of finalizing a half-thought through project to present at a mid-review in front of our professor’s peers. We go into a state of autopilot that ignores our personal foundations for design and instead just seeks an end product.

Auto-pilot is on overdrive at times like these. There is a panic of underperforming and disappointing your critiques and self that causes your design to evolve into something simplified and unrefined because anything less would mean a plan-less, section-less wall and a review from hell. It’s a slippery slope, but it’s not for lack of commitment, time management or trying.

I was incredibly guilty of this during last semester’s mid-review. It was scheduled the first studio day after Spring break, I was out of town all week, and I was royally screwed. I found myself dropping my principles and design philosophies left and right in hopes of producing a building that had, until the day before break, not existed. By brain was on autopilot, and I was designing without a second guess.

There have been countless instances with countless people when I find us discussing our excitement about joining the real world so we can have a life again. Is there something to this? If we are spending all of this brainpower and time in an autopilot state knowing a design could be better but scheduling, limitations and other variables force us to compromise second-guessing, are we really performing our best (excuse the run-on)? Are we ever really pushing the boundary of design and our own capabilities as designers when our focus is on the next unrealistic deadline?

The greatest testament to this form of thinking relates back to what I said earlier: Some of my best ideas come early in the semester.

Why? While every professor argues that a moment not spent taking advantage of the freedom of design found in architecture school is a moment wasted, why do I find myself time and time again returning to early concepts and ideas to springboard from? Are there pitfalls to this notion that not being in studio is taboo? Do my best designs come early in the semester not because I’m a super-awesome, naturally-gifted, crazy-cool person but instead because I’m taking breaks, socializing, and acknowledging other topics of interest? Does nothing of flare or innovation appear later in the semester because I’m so focused on the next deadline that I suddenly narrow the capacity of investigation or imagination?

Part of studio culture has been about one-upping the other guy: spending more time in studio, getting the least amount of sleep, creating the coolest model. If you topped everyone in any of these, it meant you had more passion, drive and commitment to architecture. But, did spending more time in studio create better work? Not necessarily. My best work came during a semester when there was a balance between my studio and social time. I made plans with other people and stuck to them. It was great – there was a refreshed perspective to studio work that I lost during semesters when my day in studio started and ended with the sun and then some. Breaks are good. Breaks mean you’re resting your brain from architecture. It gives a fresh outlook on your work.

Autopilot is great if you know where you’re going, but more often than not, are we not literally flying by the seat of our pants – producing perspectives without meaning, design sections without relationships and making models of the wrong details. We’re designing without purpose. This culminates into two final questions:

_is it better to show up with nothing qualitatively or nothing quantitatively?

_does the implied belief from teachers who deem little work a failure affect the ability of students to design effectively?



….aaaaand go.